|
|
In the northern Spanish city of Oviedo, in a small chapel attached to the city’s
cathedral, there is a small bloodstained dishcloth size piece of linen that some
believe is one of the burial cloths mentioned in John’s Gospel. Tradition has it
that this cloth, commonly known as the Sudarium of Oviedo, was used to cover
Jesus’ bloodied face following his death on the cross. Numerous historic
documents tell us that the Sudarium, unquestionably, has been in Oviedo since
the 8th century and in Spain since the 7th century. It seems, too, to have
arrived from Jerusalem.
Documents from the late Roman period and the early Middle Ages are often sketchy
and prone to chronological mistakes, and those pertaining to the Sudarium are no
exception. But from a multiplicity of sources, scholars have extracted core
elements of historical certainty and plausibility sufficient for a fair degree
of historical reconstruction. We can be quite sure that the Sudarium came to
Oviedo from Jerusalem, and there is some evidence it dates back to the first
century C.E. Its journey to its present location began in 644 C.E. when Persians
under Chosroes II invaded Jerusalem. To protect the Sudarium, it was moved out
of the city to safety. We are uncertain of its route to Spain. It may have been
first taken to Alexandria along with numerous other relics (real or otherwise,
and stored in a chest or “ark”) and from there, in succeeding years, along the
coast of North Africa ahead of advancing armies. Some historians have suggested
a more direct sea route to Spain, but forensic pollen evidence indicates that
the Sudarium was in North Africa, just as the presence of other pollen spores
evidences that it was at one time in the Jerusalem environs. Whatever the route,
we know that after it arrived in Spain, it was kept in Toledo for about 75
years. For some time after it arrived, it was in the custody of the great bishop
and an early-medieval scholar, Isidore of Seville. Then in 718, to protect it
from Arab armies, which had invaded Spain only seven years earlier, it was moved
northward with fleeing Christians. In 761, Oviedo became the capital of a
northern, well-defended enclave of Christians on the Iberian Peninsula and it
was to this city that the Sudarium was brought for safekeeping. It has been in
Oviedo ever since.
The path of the Sudarium links its origin to the same time and place of the
Shroud. Moreover, forensic analysis of the bloodstains suggests strongly that
both the Sudarium and the Shroud covered the same human head at nearly the same
time. Bloodstain patterns show that the Sudarium was placed about the man’s head
while he was still in a vertical position, presumably before he was removed from
the cross. It was then removed before the Shroud was placed over the man’s face.
|
The
scientific study of the Turin shroud is like a microcosm of the
scientific search for God: it does more to inflame any debate than
settle it.”
And yet, the shroud is a remarkable artefact, one of the few religious relics to have a justifiably mythical status. It is simply not known how the ghostly image of a serene, bearded man was made.”
Scientist-Journalist Philip Ball Nature, that most prestigious of scientific journals, that once had bragging rights to claim that the Shroud was fake, responding to new, peer-reviewed studies that discredit the carbon 14 dating and show that the Shroud could be authentic. WHAT WE KNOW IN 2005
|