Shroud of Turin Facts

Shroud of Turin FactsMore Facts

Other Topics Menu

Claim of French Bishop in 1389
Sudarium of Oviedo
Analysis of the Sudarium of Oviedo
Images of Plants
Specific Plants Observed
Coin Images
Height of the Man's Image
Nailed Through Wrists
Giv’at ha-Mivtar Remains
The 2002 Restoration
Medieval Sensibilities
Pathological Detail of Wounds
Scourging Marks
Scourging Contusions
Non-crucifixion Wounds
Travertine Aragonite
Vanillin clue to the age of the Shroud

  The scientific study of the Turin shroud is like a microcosm of the scientific search for God: it does more to inflame any debate than settle it.”

  And yet, the shroud is a remarkable artefact, one of the few religious relics to have a justifiably mythical status.

  It is simply not known how the ghostly image of a serene, bearded man was made.”

Scientist-Journalist Philip Ball
Nature, January 2005

Nature, that most prestigious of scientific journals, that once had bragging rights to claim that the Shroud was fake, responding to new, peer-reviewed studies that discredit the carbon 14 dating and show that the Shroud could be authentic.


  1. The Shroud of Turin is certainly much older than the now discredited radiocarbon date of 1260-1390. It is at least twice as old and it could be 2000 years old.  FACTS
  2. Though no one knows how it was made, the image is a selective caramel-like darkening of an otherwise clear coating of starch fractions and various saccharides.  FACTS
  3. The blood is real blood.  FACTS
  4. Much of what we think we see in the image is an optical illusion FACTS

Shroud of Turin Facts Check: 2005 Facts